I was sitting in a coffee shop the other day sneaking a quiet cup of coffee by myself when I recognized a lady who walked by. I wasn’t sure how I knew her. She was laboring under the weight of many bags of groceries, and she stopped for a rest just outside the coffee shop window. She sat on a park bench with her groceries around her feet and next to her on the seat. She had the look of someone tired, beaten down, and struggling.
Then I remembered who she was. I had taught her. I remembered her, an older woman, one of those students we sometimes call a “second-time learner”. After lectures I remember she would come up for a quick chat, ask a few questions but I most distinctly remember her for smiling a lot. I don’t remember picking up any particular signals about her abilities or lack of them until the first assignment was due. In that particular paper I used to let the first assignment be quite loose – they could be quite creative on how they presented the information and so when I received her draft I was a bit surprised. It looked like a preschooler had written it. However, as I say, there was room for creativity in the assignment providing the content was accurate. But this was something else ….. this was actually reflecting her literacy ability. And she was trying to do a degree, and I was trying to teach her science.
This story could be about a lot of things – it could be about formative feedback, diagnosis of learning disabilities in the classroom and various other pedagogical issues around detecting and supporting learning needs in the tertiary environment, but this time I am making this about entry. This woman did not pass my course, nor did she pass her other courses. In fact, I have never before issued a student as lower grade or mark as I had to for this student. Yet still she smiled as I tried to work with her.
When I think about that smile and how she looked the day I saw her on the park bench I can detect a distinct change. I think about how proud she was about being on this degree, that she was making her way towards her chosen career path, I can imagine how proud her children were of her, and probably her extended family, I can imagine how difficult it was to find the money to pay the fees, how financially difficult it was to stop her work as a carer so she could pursue fulltime study. Yet she smiled.
Of course she failed the programme and could not continue. I think about the cost of that to her. The disappointment, the financial burden, the covert message to her children, her own self-esteem and I feel angry that we put her through that. Entry criteria is not there as a barrier but as a indicator about what skills you need to meet the cognitive and learning needs of the programme of study. If students do not meet the entry criteria, we need to support their career aspirations by giving them fair and transparent advice on how best to staircase to their desired destination. It is not about letting people in and giving them a go. We need to be sure we are not setting them up for failure. I think sometimes we relatively successful people underestimate what it takes to be a fulltime student, and most of us have no clue what it takes to be a fulltime student who is inadequately prepared for academic study, and most of us have not experienced that sense of utter failure. It is not fair. Whoever let her into her the programme of study probably thought they were being kind.
That day I know why I didn’t recognize her immediately – she was no longer smiling.
Sometimes things just seem so unfair. When my little daughters used to compete in Irish River-dancing, I can remember one particular occasion where middle daughter gave it her all. She wasn’t being favoured by the judge in this competition but she took it on the chin, and didn’t give up.
The world is full of false prophets. Not those religious types that predict the world’s end, but those that have lots to say about all manner of other things. People have access now to so much information – information that was once locked in books or only a few had access to. To find out about something, you only have to “google it”.
In terms of being professional and making decisions – it does strike me as quite odd that teaching is one of the few professions where people deter the most important decisions to committees. While there is no doubt that teaching is definitely a social-cultural activity and as such, knowledge is validated by the collective, education seems to defer most decisions to the collective.
When you belong to a particular culture there tends to be certain attributes that you value and want to preserve. These usually include language, ways-of-knowing, particular ways of communicating and common values. You are usually more at ease with people who are within your culture and with whom you share these common values.
One of the reasons that ITOs came into existence was due to the impression that polytechnics were out of touch with industry. And here we are, a decade or so later, and we still hear that polytechnics are out of touch.
One particular summer in the very early 1980s, my friend and I went everywhere together wearing matching hats. Mine was green and hers was pink. They had imitation flowers on the front of them and they were very hideous (yes, I do have photos). We loved them. That is, until “Princess” Diana started wearing hats and it become fashionable. That was it; our hats were discarded in
While driving to town one day, my daughter who was 6 at the time proceeded to tell me all about how she knows about how girls are different from boys.
I was standing in the queue for the café the other day and I looked at all the people.